Full Story:
http://www.stopinjusticenow.com/News_0554.htm
The document At This Link, relates to a research project that Southall claimed he needed no ethical approval for - he did require ethical approval and got it at the Royal Brompton - on transferring to UHNS he claimed it "was standard treatment" thus negating the need for informed consent - the child this applies to was burnt by the sensors and when the mother complained - she was then accused of MSbP and the child was removed from her care. The child was eventually returned upon proof that moher was not causing the child's problems - the reasoning Southall gave for mother being MSbP "she was bought up in care herself"....
No comments:
Post a Comment