Sunday, 17 July 2011

10,000 CHILDREN RIPPED FROM THEIR FAMILIES 'Stop Injustice Now'


AT LEAST 10,000 young children have been dragged from their families and needlessly adopted due to a flawed target at the heart of Government, it was claimed last night.
Vulnerable children were handed over in their thousands under a New Labour crusade driven by artificial adoption targets.
A top Oxford academic yesterday branded the policy as Tony Blair’s worst mistake.
The expert in social work who did not want to be named said: “Forget the Iraq War. “Blair’s adoption target was the reason I left the Labour party.” Last night backing came from MP John Hemming, who said the policy led to the unnecessary adoption of 1,000 children every year.
He claims the target set 11 years ago was flawed from the outset because it contained a fundamental error of maths and he has called for a full Parliamentary inquiry to prevent further damage.

FULL STORY:-
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/259355/10-000-children-ripped-from-their-families

Sunday, 6 March 2011

Unreliable Evidence, Social Services Evidence is becoming Unreliable in the Family Courts.

Listen to the Full Broadcast:
http://www.crystalwalton.com/Me_and_the_Media.html#Unreliable_Evidence,_Social_Services_in_the_Family_Courts
Unreliable Evidence, Social Services Evidence is becoming Unreliable in the Family Courts.
BBC Radio 4 Reports, An increase in children going in to care, against the wishes of parents and based false Social Services evidence.
Social services have to make up false evidence so they can meet new government targets.
This means children like baby P (Peter Connelly) are left with abusive parents and more children are taken in to care away from inocent parents like Sarah and Ian Walton (These are there real names).
Listen to the Full Broadcast:
http://www.crystalwalton.com/Me_and_the_Media.html#Unreliable_Evidence,_Social_Services_in_the_Family_Courts

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

Met accused of 'campaign' against shaken baby witnesses

Listen to the full Broadcast
http://crystalwalton.com/Me_and_the_Media.html#Met_accused_of_

Three leading pathologists have accused the Metropolitan Police of attempting to discredit them as expert witnesses in so-called Shaken Baby court cases. About 250 Non-Accidental Head Injury (NAHI) cases go to court every year, with the outcome often relying on a expert testimony from pathologists. The Royal College of Pathologists has called for an inquiry into the claims. Responding to the allegations, the Met said the force was "completely committed to the judicial process". The scientific debate over NAHI has grown increasingly acrimonious over the past 10 years.At first it was played out in select gatherings of pathologists before ending up in courtrooms and inquests up and down the country. That debate turned toxic, with one side accusing the other of proselytising suspect scientific theories. Now, senior consultant pathologists have accused the Metropolitan Police and others of an orchestrated strategy to discredit them as expert witnesses for parents and carers accused of murdering their children.Dr Waney Squier, Dr Irene Scheimberg and Dr Marta Cohen say their evidence is based on a speech made by Detective Inspector Colin Welsh, a lead investigator with the Met's Child Abuse Investigation Command.

FULL STORY:
http://crystalwalton.com/Me_and_the_Media.html#Met_accused_of_