Listen to the full Broadcast
http://crystalwalton.com/Me_and_the_Media.html#Met_accused_of_
Three leading pathologists have accused the Metropolitan Police of attempting to discredit them as expert witnesses in so-called Shaken Baby court cases. About 250 Non-Accidental Head Injury (NAHI) cases go to court every year, with the outcome often relying on a expert testimony from pathologists. The Royal College of Pathologists has called for an inquiry into the claims. Responding to the allegations, the Met said the force was "completely committed to the judicial process". The scientific debate over NAHI has grown increasingly acrimonious over the past 10 years.At first it was played out in select gatherings of pathologists before ending up in courtrooms and inquests up and down the country. That debate turned toxic, with one side accusing the other of proselytising suspect scientific theories. Now, senior consultant pathologists have accused the Metropolitan Police and others of an orchestrated strategy to discredit them as expert witnesses for parents and carers accused of murdering their children.Dr Waney Squier, Dr Irene Scheimberg and Dr Marta Cohen say their evidence is based on a speech made by Detective Inspector Colin Welsh, a lead investigator with the Met's Child Abuse Investigation Command.
FULL STORY:
http://crystalwalton.com/Me_and_the_Media.html#Met_accused_of_
Tuesday, 22 February 2011
Thursday, 13 January 2011
Provisional Skeleton Argument Of Julian Paul Assange (Mr Assange, Wikileaks)
Read The Full Provisional Skeleton Argument
Of
Julian Paul Assange (Mr Assange, Wikileaks)
Extradition Hearing of the 7th & 8th Febuary 2011, In The Royal Courts of Justice.
Extradition Hearing of the 7th & 8th Febuary 2011, In The Royal Courts of Justice.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B7-vo-lUScJDYjg5MDA2YmQtODYwYS00ZTdjLTg2OWQtNGM1MmUzZGVkZmFm&hl=en
Friday, 19 November 2010
Wrongly Acused of Child Abuse
How one family coped with a traumatic accusation of harming their child
When Cassie Gould and Wayne Halligan took their sick son, Cavern, to hospital they were falsely accused of harming him - then began 11 months of hell as they tried to get their baby back. Being accused of abuse not only meant they lost significant s...tages of Cavern's development, but also caused a great strain on their relationship, so much so that they split up for a while.Now back with their son and back together, they are enjoying parenthood once more, but say nothing can ever bring back that lost time with their baby.Cassie and Wayne join us today to talk about their ordeal, and resident agony aunt Denise Robertson gives her opinion on the situation, and advice on how they can move on.
http://thismorning.itv.com/thismorning/life/wrongly-accused-abuse
This case is almost the same as what happened to myself.
My first wife and I were accused of hurting my son, Enfield Social Services told me to leave the family home and I was only allowed contact with someone being present. They caused us to divorce. I still have contact with both of my children from that marriage. I moved on and married Sarah, we had a child 'Crystal Walton' she was removed and has now been adopted. I was never charge or convicted of any wrong doing. I also sort to clear my name and suceeded, but 'Crystal Walton' has never been returned!
http://thismorning.itv.com/thismorning/life/wrongly-accused-abuse
This case is almost the same as what happened to myself.
My first wife and I were accused of hurting my son, Enfield Social Services told me to leave the family home and I was only allowed contact with someone being present. They caused us to divorce. I still have contact with both of my children from that marriage. I moved on and married Sarah, we had a child 'Crystal Walton' she was removed and has now been adopted. I was never charge or convicted of any wrong doing. I also sort to clear my name and suceeded, but 'Crystal Walton' has never been returned!
To read Crystal Walton's full story please visit http://www.crystalwalton.com/
Please remember to sign her Guestbook, THANKS! XXXXX
Friday, 22 October 2010
The Scandal Of The Baby Snatchers
The Original News Story Of Crystal Walton
(Before any gagging orders!)
Crystal Walton; A pawn in a shameful adoption system!
Two-year-old Crystal Walton smiles at the camera, her blonde hair blowing in the wind. The photograph of the enchanting little girl looks as though it should have pride of place in a treasured family album. Yet nothing could be further from the truth.
This picture was used to advertise Crystal's availability for adoption - appearing in a tabloid national newspaper with an accompanying blurb describing her as a "clever, lively, cheerful toddler" who likes puzzles and swimming.
A phone number was printed alongside for anyone interested in becoming her new parents.
Perhaps a million people saw the heart-breaking advert which had been placed by a London council, and streams of callers offered to take care of her.
Yet that is not the whole story. The truth is that Crystal had become a pawn in an adoption system that should shame
In 2000, Tony Blair set new targets to raise the number of children being adopted by 50 per cent - to a total of 5,400 every year.
He promised millions of pounds to councils that managed to achieve the targets. Some have already received more than £20million for successfully pushing up the number of adoptions.
This sweeping shake-up in social policy was designed for all the right reasons: to get older children languishing in care homes into happy new families with parents.
But the reforms didn't work. Encouraged by the promise of extra cash, councils began to earmark those children who were most easy to place in adoptive homes - babies and cute toddlers such as Crystal.
This picture was used to advertise Crystal's availability for adoption - appearing in a tabloid national newspaper with an accompanying blurb describing her as a "clever, lively, cheerful toddler" who likes puzzles and swimming.
A phone number was printed alongside for anyone interested in becoming her new parents.
Perhaps a million people saw the heart-breaking advert which had been placed by a London council, and streams of callers offered to take care of her.
Yet that is not the whole story. The truth is that Crystal had become a pawn in an adoption system that should shame
In 2000, Tony Blair set new targets to raise the number of children being adopted by 50 per cent - to a total of 5,400 every year.
He promised millions of pounds to councils that managed to achieve the targets. Some have already received more than £20million for successfully pushing up the number of adoptions.
This sweeping shake-up in social policy was designed for all the right reasons: to get older children languishing in care homes into happy new families with parents.
But the reforms didn't work. Encouraged by the promise of extra cash, councils began to earmark those children who were most easy to place in adoptive homes - babies and cute toddlers such as Crystal.
500 parents in legal action to win back 'stolen' children taken into care (Sunday Mirror)
This Story Has Been Re-Instated, Legal Action Be Damned
Part of the 'Crystal Walton Story' along with other families!
Full Story:http://www.crystalwalton.com/Me_and_the_Media.html#500_parents_in_legal_action_to_win_back_
Hundreds of heartbroken parents who claim social services "stole" their children have launched a legal bid to win them back.
The 500 mums and dads say it is impossible to get justice in the UK and have turned to an international court.
Families argue they are the victims of social workers who are over-zealous after cases such as Victoria Climbié and Baby Peter and a process in family courts which is excessively secretive.
They also say that the courts rely too heavily on the opinions of experts or social workers and that it is wrong that there is no right of appeal. The UK now has 64,000 children in care...a 6pc rise since 2006.
If the Court of Human Rights in The Hague backs the new case, it could let parents bring proceedings against councils - and get their children back.
The 500 mums and dads say it is impossible to get justice in the UK and have turned to an international court.
Families argue they are the victims of social workers who are over-zealous after cases such as Victoria Climbié and Baby Peter and a process in family courts which is excessively secretive.
They also say that the courts rely too heavily on the opinions of experts or social workers and that it is wrong that there is no right of appeal. The UK now has 64,000 children in care...a 6pc rise since 2006.
If the Court of Human Rights in The Hague backs the new case, it could let parents bring proceedings against councils - and get their children back.
Full Story:http://www.crystalwalton.com/Me_and_the_Media.html#500_parents_in_legal_action_to_win_back_
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)